However write my admission essay writing, there are also many more limitations specific to the case study method. Case studies simply describe the behaviours observed in the cases but fail to explain the underlying mechanisms of behaviours. Usually compare and contrast writing, researchers list detailed information about the participant such as age, gender and background but offer little or in most case no explanation of these variables. Overall, I think that case studies are an important and useful method of data collection, especially in cases of rare phenomena. It would be extremely unethical to go taking parts of peoples brains out just to make a larger sample size to use a different experimental design method. However, as data is collected on new cases I think it is important to always refer back to previous data in order to build on existing knowledge and ensure findings are as applicable to real life as possible. i like the insight into case studies you have given but i picked up that you missed out one vital problem with them which is attrition. People are more likely to leave studies if longlitudinal (which case studies usually are), which leaves the study incomplete and can be frustrating for the researcher. In an interesting discussion of the value of case study research what to write scholarship essay, Flyvbjerg (2006) sets up five "misunderstandings" about case study research what is introduction in thesis writing, which he then dismantles, substituting a more accurate statement about the issue underlying each misunderstanding. These misunderstandings and their restatements are displayed in Table 3.1. The second misunderstanding, for example, "that one cannot generalize on the basis of a single case is usually considered to be devastating to the case study as a scientific method" (p.224). However, citing single cases, experiments essay about information technology, and experiences of Galileo, Newton, Einstein master thesis banking and finance, Bohr, Darwin check my essay plagiarism, Marx, and Freud, Flyvbjerg makes the point that both human and natural sciences can be advanced by a single case. He also argues that formal generalizations based on large samples are overrated in their contribution to scientific progress (for a discussion comparing sampling argumentative thesis statement outline, representativeness, and generalizability in both quantitative and qualitative research, see Gobo, 2004). 5. It is difficult to summarize Difficulty in summarizing case Gobo, G. (2004). Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.) Qualitative research practice (pp. 435-456). London: Sage. Qualitative case studies are limited, too, by the sensitivity and integrity of the investigator. The researcher is the primary instrument of data collection and analysis. This has its advantages. But training in observation and interviewing research paper service marketing, though necessary the advantages of internet essay, is not readily available to aspiring case study researchers. Nor are there guidelines in constructing the final report. The investigator is left to rely on his or her own instincts and abilities throughout most of this research effort. Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. Hamel, J. (1993). Case Study methods. Qualitative Research Methods. Vol. 32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strengths and Limitations of Case Studies
0 Kommentare
Hinterlasse eine Antwort. |