The way society views same sex marriage can change. Throughout history, many beliefs have changed. In the past, black people were not considered as citizens in the constitution. It is not until the thirteenth amendment in 1865 that slavery was banned. Women were not considered equal to men and were not given the right to vote until 1920 when congress passed the fourteenth amendment. It takes time but opinions and beliefs can change and the past has shown us that is indeed possible! Same sex marriage are nothing more than the union of two humans being that care, love, and want to make commitments to each other. That commitment can not be recognized unless same sex marriage is legalized. Gay and lesbian unions have been for a long time a subject that no one liked to discuss. For the last few decades, gays and lesbians have come out and expressed their sexuality preferences. Many believe that same sex marriage should not be legalized because it's against the moral. It's against the definition of marriage, which is considered as the union of a man and a woman as a husband and wife. Same sex marriage should be legalized because the way society views the union of lesbian and gays can a change. Another reason why same sex marriage should be legalized is that children that are issued from a gay or lesbian couple will be loved and raised in a family that is legally recognized under the law. Lesbians and gays also deserve to have the same rights as heterosexuals. Without any exaggeration, it is a highly-discussed topic today. People were divided into groups of supporters and opponents of such practice. Both have strong and persuasive arguments. If same-sex marriage is legalized, the world will be changed entirely; it can’t be argued. Here are several points for and against that legalizing. As gay couples are not physically able to give a birth to children, increasing of such marriages can lead to the demographic crisis. Furthermore, for homosexuals it can be more complicated to adopt a child than for a traditional pair. Definitely, you are not the only one who has such neutral attitude to the issue discussed. However, even if your nearest and dearest, your friends and favorite teachers also stick to neutrality, you still should not refer to them. Instead, you can take the trouble to search for the opinions of respected scientists in the Net and use them as quite a solid base for yours. Summing up, there are lots of arguments for and against; however, some of them are myths or inaccuracies. The point is that rights of all people should be respected and nobody can be singled out for their statements or sexual orientation. There is an opinion that gay marriage is harmful for society as it reverses roles in family life. Men start to act like women and vice versa. That will make the community weak and vulnerable. Of course, it may sound unfair, but there are certain masculine and feminine professions. For example, man will be better in welder’s or plumber’s profession anyway. Moreover essay kids, kids can get wrong education, and it will badly affect their future. Boys should be definitely taught that girls are weaker and it is inexcusably to hurt them. However, there are several arguments that show legalizing in bad light. A limited time offer! The most repeated cases’ opposing gay marriages is the idea that it is immoral, but the “immoral” label is only based on religious perceptions. The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Religion is not, supposed to be the basis for our country’s laws according to the first amendment. Nevertheless, most of the individuals against gay marriage try to stress their religious beliefs onto others and make those beliefs into laws. Not everyone is religiously inclined to the same morals and beliefs. The gay community is simply fighting to be free from religion in determining the laws of the country. The opposition believes marriage should be between man and a woman; otherwise, the marriage would be untraditional. The anti-gay community also believes same-sex marriages would threaten the basis of marriage. I strongly disagree with this argument because no evidence can support this allegation. I do not believe that homosexuals are bad people. A homosexual is not worse than a heterosexual or vice versa. "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23 KJV). We are all the same. I do believe that the act of homosexuality is wrong, just as is murder, stealing, lying, and adultery. No sin is above another. I also believe that the Bible is very clear about God's view on homosexuality. Romans 1:24-28 reads, Throughout the court rulings and legislation, we have to look at the pros and cons of this issue. I would like to discuss the pros and cons list published by U.S. News and World Report. One pro for same-sex marriage says, "banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory." This pro says marriage is a "right and should not be denied to any individual." This argument goes on to compare same-sex marriages with other minorities who have been denied marriage in the past history of our nation ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?"). Some heterosexual minorities may be offended by the fact they are grouped with the homosexual minority. Is that not also discriminating? Is banning same-sex marriage really discriminatory? Throughout history groups of people have, are, and will be denied their wants, but does this mean they are being discriminated against? Elections are being affected by the way people stand on this issue. After the 1992 election, President Clinton. who is said by Human Events to be the most "pro-gay President in history," adamantly tried to abolish the ban on gays in the military. This was a victory cry for many homosexual activists. Then in the 1996 election, President Clinton admitted he would not openly oppose the bill in Congress that defines marriage as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" ("Same-sex Marriage Imperils the Family"). President Clinton term papers topics for economics, who generally supports gay rights, gives Americans a reason to believe that perhaps gay marriage is one step too far. Even First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton agreed that marriage should be a union of a man and a woman in her statement, "Marriage has got historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been: between a man and a woman" (State of the Union"). In closing, I hope that this gives you a few of the reasons same-sex marriage would be destructive to the traditional letter of application for a job vacancy, moral, and legal foundation of marriage. There are political, economical and moral issues at hand. This is not an easy issue or light issue and must be carefully thought out before a life-long decision is made. Please consider the issue and stakes at hand as you form your own firm foundation. Another pro says marketing case studies free download, "religious values shouldn't dictate who gets married." This argument is backed by the separation of church and state. It does not believe that a civil marriage should be denied but that a religious marriage would still be left up to the religious groups. Some religious groups may want to perform them. "The decision to marry should belong to the individual a cover letter for a resume, not the government, religious groups or political extremists" ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?"). If the decision to marry belongs solely to the individual, does the decision to steal, murder, or lie also belong to the individual? Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two people who love each other and plan on spending the rest of their lives together, the natural instinct is to make it legal and get married. This being said same sex marriage has been widely discussed and debated on if it should be legalized or not. It is discriminating not to allow two people who want to get married just because they are homosexual. Legalizing same sex marriage would recognize the American dream of equal rights for all. Marriage brings legal rights that protect a couple that if not married, they should not have. On the other hand, some argue that homosexual marriage may cause disorder to raise a child and disrupt the natural biological procreation of mankind. The Netherlands was the first country to legalize gay marriage in 2001, followed by Belgium research writing papers, Spain, Canada, and South Africa. Some other countries include Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland and Argentina has also legalized same sex marriage recently. (Johnson, 2009) In 2004, the state of Massachusetts had made an unprecedented move to allow same-sex marriage, being the first state in US to legalize gay marriage. The court ruled that it is illegal not to allow same-sex couples to marry. Furthermore sample college thesis paper, the laws regarding gay marriage and the benefits brought by such marriage are different in every country. For example, in Netherlands, a gay wedding can only be performed if one of the spouses has Dutch nationality. On the other hand, people can perform same-sex marriage without a residency requirement in Canada. (BBC News, 2005) Johnson, Ramon 2009, Gay marriage rights – where is gay marriage legal? – states that allow same sex marriage, viewed 12 June, 2010, <http://gaylife.about.com/od/samesexmarriage/a/legalgaymarriag.htm> The map below shows the current status of homosexuality in the world. Some countries in Africa and Asia consider homosexual as a crime and offender may receive death penalty. On the other hand, same-sex marriage is legally recognized in countries such as Canada, Spain, Belgium and The Netherlands. Although same-sex marriage is not allowed in Australia, same-sex couples are able to apply for civil unions in some states such as Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia and ACT. This event had triggered the world’s attention over the next decade and consequently led to the creation and approval of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1998. This law is exercised in the US and it has further defined the term marriage, solely as the legal union between a man and a woman. (Bower, 2010) In addition, this law asserts that no states in the US are required to recognize same-sex marriage that is performed in other places. (Masci, 2007) Perry, Kathryn 2009, The cost of gay marriage – in dollars and cents, viewed 6 June 2010, <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2009/0527/p02s07-ussc.html> Robinson B.A. 2008, Same-sex marriage: How do children fare. viewed 7 June 2010, <http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_mar13.htm > Cline. Austin 2006, Why do you really oppose gay marriage. viewed 12 June 2010, <http://atheism.about.com/b/2006/04/11/why-do-you-really-oppose-gay-marriage.htm> In addition, as married couples are happier, more optimistic and more energetic than singles, they are more productive and less likely to face health problems such as depression. National Organization for Women 2004, Same-sex marriage is a Feminist Issue, viewed 12 June, 2010, <http://www.now.org/issues/lgbi/marr-rep.html> Although gay marriage is not allowed in many countries, some places provide an alternative - civil union, as a compromise. In order to reduce controversy, the term civil union was used in replace of marriage, and it is an institution that offers same-sex couples all the rights, benefits and privileges that are equivalent to marriage. (Kirk, 2010) Professor House 2007, Gay marriages statistics, fact and interesting information, viewed 15 June 2010, <http://www.professorshouse.com/family/relationships/gay-marriage-statistics.aspx> RAND 1998, Health, Marriage and longer life for men, viewed 6 June 2010 writing application letter for employment, <http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5018/index1.html> According to the United Nation of Human rights, human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of gender how to make an outline for thesis, nationality, ethnic origin and religious view etc. Everyone has the same right and freedom to do what they want, as long as it does not cause harm to the society, and decision made by others should be respected. (Messerli, 2009) Gay marriage is the matter of civil and equal rights, and the decision to get married should belong to the couple in love, and this should not be regulated by the government. (Anton, 2008) Even though many people are not comfortable with homosexual relationship, the equality and dignity of gay couples should be respected. (Cline, 2010) Moreover, gay marriage is a personal commitment that the society should not be dictating. Withholding the right to sign a legal contract between two loving people is a severe violation of human rights. Terkel, Amanda 2010, Think Progress > Gov. Lingle Compares Same-sex marriage to insect, doesn't realize cousins can, viewed 5 June 2010, <http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/08/lingle-marriage/> Gay marriage is one of the most controversial issues in the modern world. For the past thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between a man and a woman. In most cultures across the globe, homosexuality was viewed with disdain, and marriages between same-sex couples were forbidden. Belge, Kathy 2007, The difference between marriage and civil unions, viewed 7 May 2010, <http://gaylife.about.com/od/samesexmarriage/f/civilmarriage.htm> Marriage is defined by most religious as the social institution in which two persons of opposite sex, who are not very close relatives and who declare to love each other and vow to live together forever. With the rapidly increasing single-parent family and divorce rate over the decade, the true meaning of marriage has already been weakened. (Messerli, 2009) With accepting same-sex to marry, it would further erode the respect for marriage. In addition, gay activists are requesting that the name in the birth certificates should not under the heading of father and mother, and it should be parent A and parent B instead. They refer this as an equality of name and this change has already been introduced in Spain. (Duncan, 2006) Moreover, advocates of gay marriage claim that marriage does not cause harm to anyone. However, changing the definition of marriage would lead to a slippery slope to the society. For example childhood memories essay, having multiple wives. Debate: Should same sex marriage be legal? 2010, video recording, CBS DOT DOT COM. Directed by Dr Jon LaPook, Dr Krause. Insurance breaks and family discount As a married couple, they have the visiting rights in places where visitors are restricted to immediate family, for example jail and hospital etc. Besides, they have the right to make critical medical decisions for their spouse if their partner becomes incapacitated. In the case of partner’s death, the spouse receives any earned Social Security or veteran benefits.
0 Kommentare
Hinterlasse eine Antwort. |