8. Best of luck — and don’t fail to publish. Don’t bake your cake and not put it in the oven. Remember to reach out to your peers within the profession to aid in your success. Ultimately thesis statement examples for outlines, your committee will be pleased to add a publication to their CVs. They will remember this as their reward for all the hard work that they (and you) put into your PhD. Writing a dissertation without a publication is like going to the trouble of making a cake but not baking it. No one can taste your cake, no one can benefit from your hard work—of course, no one can criticize your work either. But without a publication, or two or three active learning critical thinking, the dissertation is not technically a total success. You’d be amazed at how many people don’t get a publication out of their dissertation. Without advanced planning, a publication likely won’t happen, because, once again, there are often unanticipated roadblocks. A publication is the lasting legacy for all of your tough efforts and sacrifice. It is the “so what” of all you have put into this academic Mt. Everest. Consider the impact that your work will have on the profession. Don’t run the marathon (or climb the mountain) and not cross the finish line! Table 7: Trimming the length. Table 3: Quality of dissertation. Table 4 shows a typical listing of authors for a peer-reviewed journal with the lead author being the dissertation student, or supervisor, the second author the dissertation supervisor, student, or second academic who has publishing experience critiquing a book, and the third author the second academic or the dissertation student. This can be alternated if the second academic has to undertake work developing the paper resulting in being the second author (Table 4. author listing C). There may be the need to have additional authors if further expertise is required in terms of data analysis or knowledge of the subject area. The author listing will depend on the preferences of the authors and based upon the requirements of the work the author positions will become clear. For an academic with 91 refereed conference papers and 90 refereed journal papers the conversion factor will equal 0.989 and can be considered to show good conversion. For an academic who has presented 30 refereed conference papers and 10 journal papers this gives a figure of 0.33 and shows low conversion. By developing dissertations into journal articles it is possible to improve journal paper output. In relation to this journal productivity needs to be taken into account. In terms of the forthcoming REF there is a need for four academic journal papers by November 2013, and this can be achieved by developing four dissertations into journal papers during 2012 and 2013 (Table 1 ). A systematic approach is provided in Table 8 for turning dissertations into journal papers, and this follows fifteen stages or steps to follow from planning and starting the article to sending, receiving the reviewers’ comments from the journal, and responding to these. Table 11: Seven rules. Table 2: Criteria for developing a dissertation into a journal paper. When developing dissertations into journal publications, papers need to be written according to the journals’ rules which are published and included on journal websites. Following the introduction of the RAE there were many unprepared papers submitted to journals which resulted in a rejection rate of 80% by some journals. This rate fell but has built up before later RAEs, and this will be the same for the current REF. When identifying journals it is important to look through previous issues in the journal archive web page noting factors such as the word limit of papers, overall format, and referencing style. It is also useful to contact the editor before submitting a paper to gain views on whether the journal would be interested in the paper. Additionally, look out for special issues which a paper would easily “fit.” Choosing appropriate dissertations will involve a process of elimination to sift out those that are not the right quality and to identify appropriate subject areas of interest to the author and journals. Table 8: Dissertation to publication. Table 7 illustrates reasons for trimming in relation to journal paper development. These include the research question (narrow the focus of research questions), results (only include results that are directly relevant to the research paper), presentation (adjust according to journal requirements) can i write a book, conventions (follow the journal format), references (include those appropriate), writing style (ensure style in accordance with journal style), interpretation of data (be realistic), and undertake careful conversion (ensure that care is taken when converting). If a dissertation is the right quality and appropriate to a particular journal then a submission can be made. There are a number of factors involved and ways of doing this including the publication “toolkit” and the personal publication programme. An ideal situation for a less-experienced academic, in terms of publishing, is to have a “mentor” or more experienced colleague who can offer advice on developments within a shared subject area and who may offer to coauthor. To develop a research journal publications profile there are a number of factors that have to be taken into consideration, and these include the conversion of conference papers into journal article papers rules for writing a good essay, journal productivity, the publication process model, and criteria for developing a journal paper. First, there is the conversion factor for converting conference papers into journal papers (1 ). If this is one or greater, it is a positive factor and shows that the author has successfully taken papers from conference to journal. The quality of the dissertation is an important initial factor. If the dissertation has not received a good mark, it will probably not evolve into a ranked journal article. Table 3 shows the quality of a dissertation based on the percentage and award level. In terms of a dissertation being the right quality to form the basis of a journal paper a pass mark of 40–59% will probably not provide a dissertation that can be used. There is a need to focus on dissertations of at least 60–69% (merit) and especially 70%+ (distinction) to have the basis for a good refereed journal paper. When an article is considered, the reviewers’ comments will be made in relation to the journal review format (Table 10 ). These will include those regarding the originality of the paper set out in the introduction concerning the purpose, the relationship to the literature, the methodology, results, discussion, and conclusions. Factors taken into account are the quality of the dissertation how to run a plagiarism test, the authorship involved, selection of appropriate journals, trimming the dissertation to the correct length for the journal, and developing the draft and submission to the target journal. The criteria involved in developing a dissertation into a journal paper are shown in Table 2 . Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Policy is unclear. Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Allows — in addition, a special agreement with Springer for MIT authors allows for reuse for scholarly and educational purposes. Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Allows — must acknowledge the original publication personal statement examples for college uk, and include a copyright notice and the phrase “reprinted with permission.” Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Reuse of author’s previously published article in author’s thesis Allows authors to “Adapt the article and reproduce adaptations of the article for any purpose other than the commercial exploitation of a work similar to the original.” Submission of new article by author that first appeared as part of author’s thesis Allows. “Although the prior publication of material in a thesis or dissertation is part of a work’s publication history that needs to be acknowledged examples of covering letters, it does not disqualify material from being presented at conferences or published in AIAA’s journals.” Allows — must use final published version of the article and link via DOI to the publication on ScienceDirect. The best use of my thesis is that it levels the sofa at my dad’s house, and I do tend to pine for the days when theses were private documents and not for broad public dissemination. But here we are. So my advice is to publish your thesis in a journal if you can—but please do it only once. I voted “No” only because for the most part, publishing dissertation materials verbatim is lazy, probably will not read well, and will probably not pass muster at first review by most journals. Of course there’s nothing wrong with further publishing your own hard-earned ideas, and further publication of dissertation materials is always to be encouraged. But dissertations necessarily tend to be long discourses, often taking 100 or more pages, far more than most journals will accept. My flippant response to this question is that it is not plagiarism because, by definition, plagiarism is stealing the words, work, or ideas of another. If the thesis and publications are entirely your own work, and claimed solely by you, then self-plagiarism is an oxymoron. I voted “yes” here because I believe theses should be an exception to any definition of duplication publication. For one thing my dream home essay, many students don’t have the chance opt out of online thesis publication. We do not offer that privilege to students at my current institution (although fortunately bureaucratic wheels turn slowly and are particularly susceptible to passive aggressive students who want to protect their intellectual property). I do not believe is is fair to penalize a student that may not be able to prevent publication of their thesis, or may not have the forethought to block this practice. I also point out that—unlike publication in a journal—a scientist receives no “career points” for having their thesis appear online, so it clearly not an example of unscrupulous double-dipping. Copyright should no longer be a problem. And although exposing your best data to the world via your online thesis can certainly leave you open to intellectual theft, my experience is that most theses are hard to find online and thus their appearance on the web does not significantly usurp their novelty. I have seen some dissertations crafted so that each chapter appears for all intents and purposes to be a self-contained journal-length paper, though this has been the exception rather than the rule. In such cases, the dissertation was clearly drafted with publication in mind good english paper topics, and such chapters are fair game for submission as stand-alone articles. Other long dissertations make fine books contest essay, after some rewriting and editing. Additionally, a thesis and a journal article are completely different in terms of overall approach and format. To convert a thesis/dissertation into a journal article, it has to be rewritten and refined. More often, a journal article is crafted based on an excerpt or a chapter of a thesis, and sometimes, multiple articles can be published based on different thesis chapters. The journal article undergoes further revisions during peer review, which makes it substantially different from the thesis, thus solving the problem of duplication. Charges of self-plagiarism can be avoided by citing the thesis/dissertation in the journal paper, and using block quotes wherever content has been copied verbatim. For young researchers, the pressure to publish is immense. To establish their credibility in the science community, it is imperative for postdoctoral researchers to have at least a few publications to their name. To add to their woes, most new scholars find it daunting to write articles for publication and often find themselves struggling to even come up with a research question. Do you have any questions related to converting a thesis into a journal article? Ask Dr Eddy Copyright (year) With the approval of the thesis, dissertation, or manuscript committee and your graduate program, published materials may be accepted as part of the master's thesis, doctoral dissertation, or DPTSc manuscript when: All requests for a publishing embargo must be made to the dean of the Graduate Division. This request should come in the form of a letter from your graduate advisor, PI, or the chair of your thesis, dissertation, or manuscript committee. Unless there are extreme circumstances, the maximum length of the embargo request should not exceed one year. Please email these requests to Ellen Levitan. together with the letter from your advisor or PI. The graduate dean will review your request and the Graduate Division will let you know if your request has been approved or not. Copyright Multiple Published Papers
0 Kommentare
Hinterlasse eine Antwort. |